A History of Cobb County Georgia

From: “The First Hundred Years” (1935. Sarah Blackwell Gober Temple)
 
CHAPTER I: EVENTS LEADING TO THE ORGANIZATION OF COBB COUNTY
 

§ TREATY RELATIONS WITH THE CHEROKEE INDIANS

1
 
    On the morning of May 29, 1820, a tall weatherbeaten man stood at the Shallow Ford on the Chattahoochee River, in Georgia. He surveyed the pleasant scene before him. The river sparkled in the spring sunlight. The wooded slopes were covered with fresh green foliage, the distant reaches veiled in a blue haze.
    He was not actually thinking of the scene itself, but of the struggle for the possession of the land upon which he stood. It was his consideration of the animosities attendant upon the ultimate outcome of this struggle between the Indians and the white people which gave him pause.
    Whatever that outcome, he was here now to uphold the law. He bent his head to write. He was often not good at spelling, but he always made himself understood.
    “Intruders on the Cherokee lands, beware,” he began with his customary directness. “I am required to remove all white men found trespassing on the Cherokee lands not having a written permit from the agent, Colo. R. J. Meigs, this duty I am about to perform. The Regulars and Indian Light horse will be employed in performing this service, and any opposition will be promptly punished. All white men with there live stock found trespassing on the Indian land will be arrested and handed over to the civil authorities of the United States to be dealt with as the law directs, there families removed to U. S. land, there crops, houses and fences destroyed …”
    He signed his name. Andrew Jackson. Then he posted his notice, mounted his horse, and turned toward Alabama.
    “On the excursion through the Cherokee Nation,” he wrote to Mr. Calhoun, the Secretary of War, on June 15, “I found a great many intruders and those on the north of the Chatahoochey not only numerous but insolent and threatening resistance.”
    Those fertile acres along the Chattahoochee River, which forms the southern boundary of the present Cobb County, were coveted by the white man and held by the Cherokees. Again and again intruders settled upon them, only to be driven off by Indian agents appointed by the United States Government, or by the Indians themselves. Eighteen years were to elapse before the destiny of the Cherokees east of the Mississippi was determined. Twelve years went by before Cobb County came into being. General Jackson, as he stood near the edge of the county that spring morning in 1820, foresaw only a part of the complications which would attend the organization of the county, and the coming of the day when white men would finally become the legal owners of land which for years beyond the memory of man had been in the possession of the Indians.
    Cobb and the other counties formed from the Cherokee Nation came into being with reverberations which shook the country and Georgia from end to end; arrayed friend against friend; threatened the state with disciplinary measures by the general government; caused Georgia to defy the nation; and unloosed upon the people of the state such criticism and odium as has not been experienced except at the time of the War Between the States and during the subsequent reconstruction period.
    We must turn back some years if we are to understand properly this dramatic chapter in the history of the nation and its relation to the history of the county. We shall see how cessions of Cherokee land to the government lessened the Indian holdings and provided opportunity for settlement by white men in a time when most men were seeking new land. The slow, merciless march of time wrought inevitably the changes in the fortunes of white men and Indians which resulted in the organization of Cobb County. Historians have written vindictively of this group or that, this white man or that Indian, whose machinations caused the tide of affairs to boil more furiously at one point, to recede at another. This is futile. Bitterness and recrimination have no place in the long reach of history, and are to be considered, in arriving at truth, only as details of the great pageant.

Continue reading “A History of Cobb County Georgia”

V838 Monocerotis Light Echo

V838 Monocerotis a spectroscopic binary star system (a binary star evident from the Doppler effect) in the constellation Monoceros about 19,000 light years from the Sun. Identified as a luminous red novae, thought to have been [caused by the] merger of two stars within a triple system.

V838 Monocerotis and its light echo as imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope on December 17, 2002
CreditNASA/ESA
Images showing the expansion of the light echo. Credit: NASA/ESA.

light echo is a physical phenomenon caused by light reflected off surfaces distant from the source, and arriving at the observer with a delay relative to this distance. The phenomenon is analogous to an echo of sound

Reflected light following path B arrives shortly after the direct flash following path A but before light following path C. B and C have the same apparent distancefrom the star as seen from Earth.
Direct light from a stellar outburst (white spot) reaches the observer (path 0) followed by light reflected off particles on progressively wider paraboloids (1–5): the observed disc apparently initially expands faster than light but the illusion is due to light reflecting off different unrelated particles
Animation of 11 images of light echo of V838 Mon

In the case of V838 Monocerotis, the light echo produced was unprecedented and is well documented in images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. While the photos appear to depict an expanding spherical shell of debris, they are actually formed by the illumination of an ever-expanding ellipsoid with the progenitor star at one focus and the observer at the other. Hence, despite appearances, the structures in these photos are actually concave toward the viewer.

Source Wikipedia: V838 Monocerotis, Light echo

Foundations (of Equivalent Exchange)

Transmutation Circle from Fullmetal Alchemist

Newtonian mechanics is built on the foundation of Newton’s three laws of motion (cause and effect) 

Which state: 

1. An object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. Because inertia is the property of a body to resist any change in its state of rest or uniform motion, this law is also known as the law of inertia. In this sense, the mass of a body is a measure of its inertia and is called the inertial mass of the body.

2.  If a net force acts on an object, it will cause an acceleration of that object. The relationship between an object’s mass m, its acceleration a and the applied force F is given by the vector equation

F = ma

3. When one object exerts a force on another object, the second object exerts an equal force in the opposite direction on the first object. Said another way, that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, hence the alternative name for this law as the action-reaction law.

Commensurately:

Buddhist philosophy is built on the foundation of cause and effect (Tibetan: rgyu ‘bras; Sanskrit: hetuphala) the primary features of this law being:

1. Nothing evolves uncaused

2. Any entity which itself lacks a process of change cannot cause any other event

3. Only causes which possess natures that accord with specific effects can lead to those effects

 

“It is mind itself that sets in place the myriad array of beings in the world, and the world that contains them…living beings all arise from karma, and so without mind, there could be no karma.”

Madhyamakāvatarā, VI: 89
Bibliography:
A Most Incomprehensible Thing: Notes Towards a Very Gentle Introduction to the Mathematics of Relativity by Peter Collier

The Handbook of Tibetan Culture, 1993. 
Compiled by Graham Coleman

SOME MATHEMATICAL THEOREMS ON PERSPECTIVE DRAWING

From: Chapter 10, Mathematics for the Nonmathematician, Morris Kline

Let us accept, then, the principle that the canvas must contain the same section that a glass screen placed between the eye of the painter and the actual scene would contain. Since the artist cannot look through his canvas at the actual scene and may even be painting an imaginary scene, he must have theorems which tell him how to place his objects on the canvas so that the painting will, in effect, contain the section made by a glass screen.

Suppose then that the eye at E (Fig. 10–8) looks at the horizontal line GH and that GH is parallel to a vertical glass screen. The lines from E to the points of GH lie in one plane, namely the plane determined by the point E and the line GH, for a point and a line determine a plane. This plane will cut the screen in a line, G′H′, because two planes which meet at all meet in a line. It is apparent that the line G′H′ must also be horizontal, but we can prove this fact and so be certain. We can imagine a vertical plane through GH. Since GH is parallel to the screen and the latter is also vertical, the two planes must be parallel. The plane determined by E and GH cuts these parallel planes, and a plane which intersects two parallel planes intersects them in parallel lines. Hence G′H′ is parallel to GH, and since GH is horizontal, so is G′H′. But GH was any horizontal line parallel to the screen. Hence the image on the screen of any horizontal line parallel to the screen or picture plane must be horizontal. Thus in a painting which is to contain what this glass screen contains, the line G′H′ must be drawn horizontally.

We can present practically the same argument to show that the image of any vertical line, which is automatically parallel to the vertical screen, must appear on the screen as a vertical line. Thus all vertical lines must be drawn vertically. Continue reading “SOME MATHEMATICAL THEOREMS ON PERSPECTIVE DRAWING”

Indo-European Language-Tree

French Dieu
Spanish Dios from
Latin Deus from 
Ancient Greek Zeus from
Proto-Hellenic *dzéus from
Proto-Indo-European *deiwos meaning "celestial" or "shining"

Iuppiter or Jūpiter from
Roman Diespiter (deus + Latin: pater = English: father) from 
Proto-Italic *djous patēr from
Proto-Indo-European root *Dyḗws*Pahtḗr 
	literally meaning "Sky Father"
Whence is also derived the name of the Hindu sky god Dyáuṣ Pitṛ́ (Vedic Sanskrit: Dyáuṣpitṛ́)
and Proto-Germanic *Tīwaz or Tius hence Old Norse Týr 

English mother from 
Middle English moder from 
Old English mōdor from 
Proto-Germanic *mōdēr from 
Proto-Indo-European *méh₂tēr 
Other cognates include 
  Spanish madre
  Latin māter
  Greek mā́tēr/mā́tar 
  Slavic *mati 
  Persian madar
  Sanskrit mātṛ 

English Sin from
Old English synn "moral wrongdoing" from 
Proto-Germanic *sundiō probably "it is true" from 
Proto-Indo-European *snt-ya-, a collective form from 
*es-ont- "becoming" 
  present participle of root *es- "to be"

Sanskrit Bodhisattva "one whose essence is perfect knowledge," from 
bodhi "perfect knowledge" + sattva "reality, being" from 
sat-, sant- "existing, true, virtuous" from 
Proto-Indo-European root *es- "to be"

Laniakea (Hawaiian: Immense Heaven)

Superclusters, the biggest structures in the Universe, are regions of space that are densely packed with galaxies. This image maps Laniakea according to the flow of galaxies across space.
Map of superclusters of galaxies and voids in a distance of one billion light years from the milky way. The supercluster Laniakea is marked in yellow.
The Local Group’s location within the Virgo Supercluster as part of the larger Laniakea Supercluster.
Local Group and nearest galaxies (not to scale).
The Milky Way

Celestial Sphere

Click on images for greater detail.

Constellations (modern) key, by family and year established, and ecliptic:

Constellations map (see key above):

Constellations of Northern Hemisphere:

Constellations of Southern Hemisphere:

Harmonia Macrocosmica Comica

From the Harmonia Macrocosmica by Andreas Cellarius.