From: “A Guide to the Bodhisattva’s Way of Life” (S. Bodhisattvacharyavatara; Tib. Byang-chub sems-pa’i spyod-pa-la ‘jug-pa) by Shantideva, Chapter V “Guarding Alertness” verses 9-17 with commentary from “The Nectar of Manjushri’s Speech” by Kunzang Pelden, Chapter 5 “Vigilant Introspection” herein section 3, “All Virtue Comes From The Mind”
“There is nothing to fear other than my mind“
9
If the perfection of generosity
Were the alleviation of the world’s poverty,
Then since beings are still starving now,
In what manner did the previous Buddhas perfect it?
Generosity too derives from the mind. For if the paramita of generosity were to consist in the actual distribution of great gifts leading to the complete elimination of poverty without a single beggar remaining, how can it have been achieved by the Buddhas of the past (for still to this day there are many beggars and starving people)? The fact is, however, that it has been achieved by them. What then is the perfection of generosity?
10
The perfection of generosity is said to be
The thought to give all beings everything,
Together with the fruit of such a thought;
Hence it is simply a state of mind.
The teachings explain that generosity is perfected by training oneself in the attitude of openhandedness, in the genuine intention, wholly without miserliness and cupidity, to give to all beings—high and low, rich and poor—one’s every possession: body and belongings, along with the merit of such a gift, without any expectation of recompense whether in this or future lives. It is said in the Akshayamatisutra, “What is the paramita of generosity? It is the sincere wish to give to others whatever one has, together with the karmic result of such an act.” The term paramita implies that the act of giving is performed in a manner free from the assumption of the real existence of the subject and object of the action, as well as of the action itself. The same is valid for the other five paramitas. Therefore generosity does not depend on the objective value of the gift. It depends on a generosity of attitude untrammeled by any kind of attachment that would prevent one from making a gift of one’s external possessions or of one’s inner qualities and merit. It follows that generosity is in the mind.
11
Nowhere has the killing
Of fish and other creatures been eradicated;
For the attainment of (merely) the thought to forsake (such things)
Is explained as the perfection of moral discipline.
Ethical discipline likewise comes from the mind, as can be seen in relation to the act of killing. It is impossible to find a place to put living beings (such as fish and other animals) where they will be protected from being killed. But regardless of whether other beings put them to death, if we are determined to refrain from doing so, thinking that we will not kill even at the cost of our lives, this is said to be the perfection of ethical discipline. The sutras define this paramita as the decision to refrain from harming others. In the same way, the vow of chastity, cannot be observed simply by doing away with objects of lust. Ethical discipline subsists in the attitude of restraint, in ridding oneself of desire. If this attitude is absent, mere abstention from untoward activities does not constitute discipline. Therefore, once again, discipline comes from the mind.
12
Unruly beings are as (unlimited) as space:
They cannot possibly all be overcome.
However, if I overcome thoughts of anger alone,
This will be equivalent to vanquishing all foes.
Patience also arises from the mind. Dangerous and unruly beings are everywhere like space itself, and wherever you go, you will never find anywhere that is outside space. In other words, there is nowhere that is free of beings liable to inflict harm on others. It is impossible to get rid of such harm-doers. It is impossible to do away with the objects of our anger. But even though there are always enemies who will injure us, if through the practice of patience we are able to subdue our own enraged minds, it will be as if we had succeeded in overcoming all such foes.
13
Where would I possibly find enough leather
With which to cover the surface of the earth
Yet (wearing) leather just on the soles of my shoes
Is equivalent to covering the earth with it.
Shantideva illustrates this with the idea of covering the entire earth with leather, with sheets of soft hide, in order to protect ourselves from thorns and the like. Where could such quantities of leather be found? Obviously nowhere. On the other hand if we were simply to cover our feet, by putting on shoes with leather soles, it would be as if the whole earth had been covered with it and our purpose would be achieved.
14
Likewise, it is not possible for me
To restrain the external course of things;
But should I restrain this mind of mine
What would be the need to restrain all else?
In the same way, although it is impossible to avert or do away with every external source of harm, all we need to do is remove our inner attitude of anger. What need is there to get rid of outer irritants?
15
Although the development of merely a clear state of concentration
Can result in (taking birth in) Brahma’s realm,
Physical and vocal actions cannot so result
When (accompanied) by weak (mental) conduct.
Diligence too is founded on the mind. If we generate a clear, unequivocal attitude of kindness or compassion, like the loving thoughts of a mother for her only child, this state will fructify as rebirth in the Brahma-world, which is a heaven of the form realm, and in all the exalted states of bliss associated with such a state. It is said in the Mahaparinirvana-sutra, for example, that the great compassion felt by a mother for her dying child and the vivid intention of love felt for each other by a mother and her daughter when they were both carried away by a river resulted after death in their being born in the Brahma-world. Thus no matter what good deeds of body and speech we may diligently perform, this will not automatically result in rebirth in the Brahma-world, because physical and verbal actions are weak in the results that they give. It is the mind that is the chief criterion. This text defines diligence as a state of mental joy, though there are numerous ways in which diligence might be discussed
16
The Knower of Reality has said
That even if recitation and physical hardships
Are practiced for long periods of time,
They will be meaningless if the mind is distracted elsewhere.
Generally speaking, concentration is also a practice of the mind. It is true that one may for a long time undergo every kind of physical austerity as a means to bring about the birth of concentration in the mind stream (such as recitation, or going without food or clothing). But if the mind is distracted by objects of desire, fluttering like a scrap of paper caught in a tree, no matter what recitations or austerities are pertormed, their hoped-for aim will not be achieved. This was said by the Buddha himself, who has a direct unmediated vision of the nature of all things. In the sutra Distillation of Concentration, the Buddha said, “O monks, if your mind is distracted by desire, none of your austerities and prayers will give any result.” And as we find in the Prajnaparamita-sutra: “Through my mind’s distraction, I fail to accomplish my own good, let alone the good of others. Therefore, I will not allow my mind to be distracted even slightly?”
17
Even those who wish to find happiness and overcome misery
Will wander with no aim nor meaning
If they do not comprehend the secret of the mind-
The paramount significance of Dharma.
As for wisdom, the most important thing for everyone to understand is the nature of the mind, which is empty, devoid of self, and luminous. Although everyone possesses it, not everyone knows or realizes it—which is why it is described as a secret. All external phenomena arise in the mind like reflections in a mirror. They are mental fabrications. They are the mere display of the mind and do not extend beyond it. The principal task therefore is to understand the mind clearly, and to that end we must use reasoning. We must examine the mind. We must look for its shape, its color, and so on. We must search for the place where the mind arises, where it dwells, and where it ceases. If we fail to understand that the mind is beyond every concept of origin, dwelling, and cessation; if we fail to penetrate this secret of the mind its emptiness and lack of self), then however much we long to achieve the joy of nirvana and to uproot the sorrows of samsara, we will wander uselessly in misery. Concerning this secret of the mind, the Shravakas and Pratyekabuddhas fully understand only the personal No-Self; they do not understand the No-Self of phenomena, which remains hidden from them, a secret.
To sum up therefore in the words of the Gandavyuha: “All Bodhisattva conduct is founded on the mind.”
…
Regarding the six perfections (paramita)
- Generosity [verse 9,10]
- Ethical Discipline [11]
- Patience [12-14]
- Diligence [15]
- Meditative Concentration [16]
- Wisdom [17]
Manopubbangamā dhamma
manosetthā manomayā;
manasā ce padutthena bhāsati vā karoti vā
tato nam dukkham anveti cakkam va vahato padam.
Mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with an impure mind a person speaks or acts, suffering follows like the wheel that follows the foot of the ox.
Manopubbangamā dhammā
manosetthā manomayā;
manasā ce pasannena bhāsati vā karoti vā
tato nam sukham anveti chāyā vā anapāyinī.
Mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with a pure mind a person speaks or acts, happiness follows like a never-departing shadow.
from: Dhammapada, Yamakavagga (The Pairs) verse 1,2